pielt forskellige kommunikationsmønstre. Jeg vil kort uddybe de fire, før jeg gennem et konkret ek-
sempel illustrerer, hvorfor begrebet især i Web 2.0 sammenhæng, kan forveksles.
1. Transmission
Jensen beskriver transmission i tråd med Shannon og Weavers kommunikationsmodel. Det vil sige, at
interaktionen foregår som McQuail og Windahl definerede som an action on – kommunikationen løber
udelukkende i én retning, fra afsender til modtager. Afsenderen kontrollerer valget af og tidspunktet
for den information, der skal distribueres til modtageren. Brugerens kommunikationsadfærd er her
reduceret udelukkende til modtagelse – som eksempelvis gennem broadcast-medier som radio og tv.
2. Konsultation
Ved konsultativ interaktion kan brugeren vælge blandt et eksisterende udbud af i forvejen produceret
information. Denne type af interaktion er eksempelvis gældende for internettets hypertekststruktur,
hvor brugeren kan klikke og vælge mellem forskellige tekster og dermed danne sin egen ikke-lineære
læsning – som eksempelvis ved et genstandsmuseum, hvor brugeren kan søge i en samling efter inte-
resse, eller som ved de hjemmesider, der generelt kan karakteriseres som Web 1.0. Man kunne derfor
udvide transmissionsmodellen med en feedback mulighed, som modellen her illustrerer:
”The simple communications model with feedback loop” (Hooper-Greenhill, 2000, p.44)
3. Konversation
Hvis informationen produceres og ejes af informationsbrugerne, og kontrollen over distributionen
ligeledes ligger hos informationsbrugerne, er der tale om det diametralt modsatte kommunikations-
mønster i forhold til transmission, nemlig typen konversation. Den konversationelle interaktion er en
udfoldelse af interaktionsparadigmet. Her er der tale om to- eller flervejskommunikation, hvor der
eksisterer et reelt decentralt forhold mellem kommunikatorerne. De traditionelle afsender- og modta-
gerroller opløses, idet indholdet skabes i en gensidig og dynamisk proces, hvor afsender bliver modta-
ger og vice versa, hvilket Yoshikawas Double Swing model kan illustrere:
Thanks for all your efforts that you have put in this. very interesting information.
pastillas priligy en mexico There was a decrease in DCS incidence, delay in onset of DCS, decreased decompression related neurological issues, and decreased depression of platelet counts
He underwent surgery May 29 cronadyn vs priligy The estimated disease free rate at 5 years was 68 among patients with Stage II disease and 52 for patients who had Stage III disease
jxgis8
where to buy priligy usa Patients may well have better outcomes and I d hope patients would have a better quality of life as a consequence, too, compared to some of the side effects they get from existing treatments
With a focus on precision and reliability, BWER offers state-of-the-art weighbridge systems to Iraq’s industries, meeting international standards and supporting operational efficiency.
where buy cytotec without a prescription Thank you Drs
BWER Company stands as a trusted name in Iraq’s weighbridge industry, offering innovative designs, reliable installations, and comprehensive support for all weighing requirements.
Revolutionize your weighing needs with BWER, Iraq’s top provider of weighbridge systems, featuring unparalleled accuracy, durability, and expert installation services.
Seven Major Classes of Biomarkers Contributing to the Biomarker Profile in HF cost of generic cytotec tablets
I don’t normally comment but I gotta admit thankyou for the post on this special one : D.
Baddiehub This is my first time pay a quick visit at here and i am really happy to read everthing at one place
Baddiehub I like the efforts you have put in this, regards for all the great content.
Blue Techker I very delighted to find this internet site on bing, just what I was searching for as well saved to fav
BWER Company provides Iraq’s leading-edge weighbridge solutions, designed to withstand harsh environments while delivering top-tier performance and accuracy.
Noodlemagazine Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on websites